With insufficient laws to address this problem or the lack of teeth in these laws, criminals become careless and bolder to commit heinous crimes because of the leniency in punishments and loop holes in the justice system. For these reason, there is a need for death penalty. It is constitutional and does not violate the Eight Amendment which prohibits the federal government from imposing excessive bail, fines and cruel and unusual punishments, including torture.
Advocates of death penalty say that the pain associated with the execution of a death row inmate is not improbable. Supreme Court has rejected the Eight Amendment challenge which stated that the drug used to render the criminal coma-like unconscious before injecting the lethal drug is not capable to do so completely. The Supreme Court was firm on its stand that any method of execution definitely will inflict some pain and states with capital punishment have already adopted more humane methods to carry out executions.
Death penalty is a just punishment for crimes committed against the rights to life, freedom and safety of victims. It is the right of an individual to live peacefully and be free from harm. Unfortunately, crimes like murder, rape and assault are committed by perpetrators who have no regard for life and property of others.
People who are for capital punishment also talk about free will wherein an individual is given the right to do things in his or her own volition and he or she is responsible for his or her own fate. Innocent people are wrongly executed. One of the arguments of opponents of death penalty is the inevitability of sending innocent people who are wrongly accused to death row and eventually execution.
The sad thing about this, according to those who are opposed is that innocence is proven after the execution has been carried out. In relation to free will, some criminals are suffering from mental illness or are having clouded judgment at the time of the crime. Opponents contend that there are instances where people commit pre-meditated crimes and are aware of what they are doing. However, it does not discount the fact that crimes can also be committed out of passion or extreme anger triggered by a situation which makes an offender act on impulse.
There are also those who are suffering from mental illnesses and are not taking medication which can lead to them committing offenses they have no control of.
In light of these gross inequalities, the continuation of capital punishment constitutes egregious discrimination. Pros and cons of the Death Penalty. Accessed September 15, We will write a custom essay sample on Pros and cons of the Death Penalty specifically for you. Leave your email and we will send you an example after 24 hours If you contact us after hours, we'll get back to you in 24 hours or less.
Pros and cons of the Death Penalty Essay. Some of the pros and cons are as follows: How to cite this page Choose cite format: Death Penalty 79 , Penology How about make it original? Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email.
This is because the family of the victim, which is innocent, has suffered their loss and the family of the prisoner will have to go through the same trauma. There is a probability that not all people sentenced to death are guilty of the crime. Various cases have been documented in the past where DNA test results showed that the wrong persons had been murdered by the state. This shows the imperfection in the justice system where the rich talk. Poor defendants are not given legal attention as required and the little they get is from less qualified individuals, the only one they can afford Clegg, There are also cases of mentally ill persons being put to death.
It is not their fault to be that way and no amount of schooling, reinforcements, drugs or rehabilitation can change them. It is not fair to judge someone who committed a crime due to their lack or poor reasoning capacity brought about by a brain defect. The constitutions of several countries state that it is wrong to sentence a mentally ill individual to death but this rule is vague since the jury and judge need convincing and proof of the illness in the defendant.
Criminals are often despised by the society but killing them brings a feeling of sympathy. It makes the society shift their sympathy to the criminal from the victim. Death penalty has a way of bringing lawyers on board. In most cases the defendant is pronounced guilty. Attorneys know how to manipulate, cover facts up, and make the jury sympathetic on their side.
They can find obscure technicalities which would make their client plead innocent but that does not happen because criminals cannot afford them Joshua, Death penalties are different because lawyers avail themselves to earn a reputation. The judgment made in their attempt to showcase their power is wrong, guilty persons are released. A death sentence is useless because it does not bring the already dead victim back to life. It should thus be banned because the fact that the victim is never coming back cannot be changed.
All kinds of emotions; revenge, anger and hate will never fill up the emptiness felt for losing a loved one. Forgiveness should be the way forward to creating a morally upright society. A penalty of death gives closure to the family of the victim.
They take long to shock and loss while others do not recover at all but recovery could be hastened by receiving this kind of closure. They believe a death penalty brings finality to them. It is also a way of deterring crime otherwise it would be so rampant. Even though life in prison is enough some crimes and people need more, death penalty being one of them. By giving a death sentence there is better service on the line of justice because the punishment given fits the crime committed.
It is sensible that a brutal killer be submitted to his own medicine. By not giving the sentence the justice system would be depriving the victims of something. This act would show sympathy on the side of the defendant other than the victim. For a person to have committed murder in most cases it means there is a line of other crimes he has done and all the victims in each would be relieved to finally get justice and it means that justice for the past and current crimes is served.
A death penalty deters prisoners serving a life imprisonment. They could murder people when in prison.
Essay The Death Penalty: A Discussion on Its Pros and Cons Words | 5 Pages The death penalty, a constant source of controversy and divided opinion, is the punishment of death given to criminals who commit severe crimes.
the death penalty has disproportionately been applied in cases in which the defendant is nonwhite or the victim is white. There are several effective arguments against the death penalty, including the fact that some people have been executed, and the government has later discovered their innocence.
Common dissertations written by students take the form of persuasive essay on death penalty: the pros and cons. When writing such an essay, one must provide a background into the topic. The next step is to take a position, either to support or refute the notion of imposing death penalty. The reasons for the position taken must be provided. Top 10 Pros and Cons Should the death penalty be allowed? The PRO and CON statements below give a five minute introduction to the death penalty debate. (Read more information about our one star to five star Theoretical Credibility System) 1. Morality 2. Constitutionality 3. Deterrence 4. Retribution 5. Irrevocable Mistakes 6.
The pros and cons of the death penalty in the United States has been an issue of debate since its inception. The first death penalty style execution was performed in in the colony of Jamestown. And arguments for the death penalty and arguments against the death penalty . The Death Penalty Pros And Cons Essay Posted on August 21st, Capital punishment or death penalty is a very common topic for writing a pros and cons essay, and many students choose it as a really great issue which opens plenty of room for discussion.